The Dark Citadel

As Michelle Malkin pointed out back in March, SCOTUS has heard one of the largest cases in terms of precendent that they have looked at in a long time.  To put a little backstory on the case, lets quote a bit from Wikipedia:

District of Columbia v. Heller, No. 07-290, is a case pending before the Supreme Court of the United States. It is an appeal from Parker v. District of Columbia, 478 F.3d 370 (D.C. Cir. 2007), a decision in which the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit became the first federal appeals court in the United States to rule that a firearm ban was an unconstitutional infringement of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, and the second to expressly interpret the Second Amendment as protecting an individual right to possess firearms for private use.

The Supreme Court however has limited somewhat the scope of the case to the following:

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to the following question: Whether the following provisions, D.C. Code §§ 7-2502.02(a)(4), 22-4504(a), and 7-2507.02, violate the Second Amendment rights of individuals who are not affiliated with any state-regulated militia, but who wish to keep handguns and other firearms for private use in their homes?

While this decision will only directly affect the DC case, SCOTUS’ decision here will set a very strong precedent for other possible cases to follow.  For the full backstory of the case, I’d suggest reading the Wikipedia article.

Last friday in the school paper they carried an article and a following editorial about the pro’s and cons about concealed carry on College campuses. Although the article well decently written and helped to point me to a student organization I hadn’t heard about yet, the editorial read like the latest propaganda to come out of the Brady Center. While they say they ‘examined the evidence’ they completely forgot to actually cite this so called evidence they looked at, and the rest of their arguments were made up of “What-If” and outlandish hyperbole. I hate to look like I’m just spouting group-think but this is one school paper that is definitively Liberal-biased. At least I can hope for some more Liberal bobble-head reader editorials in next weeks Opinion section, I do need a good laugh.